PT-LawMom tagged me to participate in this year's "Lawyers Appreciate..." campaign. Here are five of the things I appreciate the most in my practice.
- Honesty. From clients, opposing parties, opposing counsel, staff, and jurists. As a newbie lawyer, I remember how shocked I was when I realized clients lie to their attorneys. I went across the street, to where my experienced lawyer neighbor was working in his wood shop and blurted, "You didn't tell me that everyone lies!" (Which, in retrospect, was an odd way of bringing up the subject -- it's obvious now that I felt very betrayed by my client, who had very flagrantly misrepresented his situation.) He gave me a beer, sat me down, and explained exactly why it is clients lie.
Now I've learned to see through a lot of the BS, but it's difficult for me. I take people at face value, either because I know them to be truthful, or because I know it isn't socially productive to question what they're telling me. (I had been trained, in social situations, not to point out people's inaccuracies.) In time, maybe, I'll get more artful at my anti-lying speech, which currently goes something like this: "In order for me to do my best for you, you must be completely truthful with me, even if you think you've done or said something that could hurt your position. I need to know, so that I can deal with it."
- Articulate opposing counsel. I do a lot of written work, a fair amount of which is "pure" legal writing in response to someone else's memo or brief. Nothing annoys me more than a stream-of-consciousness, cobbled together memorandum. It's very difficult to put together an organized, thoughtful response to a chaotic piece of work - it requires a complete reframing of the issues from the ground up. Sometimes it's impossible to really tell what arguments they're making. Occasionally, it's taken me hours just to organize a response, because the opening document is so completely random - not a good use of anyone's time or money. And I always wonder if a judge reads the opening memo or brief, then throws up his or her hands and ignores mine, preferring instead to let the parties duke it out in oral argument.
But when I get a beautiful piece of legal writing to respond to? It makes my job so much easier. I can respond point-by-point to their arguments and I can focus on the substance, rather than the organization. It's heavenly.
- Civil opposing counsel. Attorneys who don't take themselves seriously are wonderful to work with. I'm talking about both courtly counsel who treat me like a grown-up, even though their bar numbers predate my parents' first date, as well as the counsel who weren't old enough to watch Charles and Di tie the knot. I blogged earlier about the good ol' boy who likes to pretend I don't exist, even though I'm making him work for his fees. Although I find that sort of thing pathetic rather than insulting, at least he's quiet about his deprecation. What drives me nuts are the guys (and they are guys) who call and start ranting about the horrible things my client has done, even before I've finished saying "hello." (Note to these guys: it takes a lot to intimidate me. That won't cut it.)
But those who are comfortable in their own skins and don't need to posture, who let the legal issues and the factual issues speak for themselves, and leave the saber-rattling for the courtroom? I so much enjoy working with them.
- Non-attorney friends. I consider it a huge victory to have kept my friends through law school, when I was a rotten friend to them. Often, when I'm feeling down on myself because I haven't done something or other as well as I think I ought, or because I feel like I should be further along in my master career plan, my non-attorney friends put it all in perspective for me. They have told me how proud they are of me, and of how nice it is for them to be able to say, "My friend, the lawyer...." and to have me around to ask questions of. It really means a lot. And oh, to be able to talk with people who don't want to talk about the law? It's wonderful. In case you haven't noticed, most law is pretty boring. I'm glad people still want to have me around, even if my conversation skills are substantially limited, and I'm known to rant on and on about the misuse of the word "foreseeable."
- Doctor jokes. Everyone's got lawyer jokes -- my father has told me the same joke, over and over, about the lawyers in the bottom of the ocean ("a good start" is the punchline). I'm not sure why people love to get their digs into lawyers, considering all the good lawyers do in the world, but the jokes are ubiquitous. (And if someone else tells me that they can't possibly vote for John Edwards because "he's a rich lawyer," I will probably hurl.)
To my mind, doctors engage in serious ethical conflicts, such that would get an attorney in my state in deep water. Most doctors take gifts, large and small, from drug companies for "education purposes," but really so the doctors will prescribe the company's drugs. To me, it screams "self-dealing" and "bias," and remember, we're talking about something that impacts whether a person lives or dies (not whether they make or lose money in a lawsuit). Many spend only five minutes at a time with each patient, while charging $120 (or more) for the "visit" (OK, I know they may only get $60, but it's still a lucrative 5 minutes.) They don't hire RNs to assist them, but marginally trained "medical assistants." Here, at least, they do an abysmal job at policing themselves via their state board, and it's very difficult to get a malpractice claim to stick.
But the strangest bit yet, they blame lawyers for their malpractice insurance. So yes, I love my doctor jokes.
I tag: Skelly, Mellow, and Yin and Yang.
My list is pretty much the same as yours except that I would need to add something about friendly judges to mine. I appear pretty regularly in front of 10 different judges and have come to really dread a few of them just because they have the personality of a brillo pad. However, I've really come to like a few too, just because they are so damn friendly :)
Posted by: Matt | December 25, 2007 at 07:39
That's a good one. And judges who let you off of a case when you really want off of a case. :) I'm glad you commented -- I wanted to tag you, even without a blog!
Posted by: Shelley | December 25, 2007 at 09:26
I'm actually starting to come out of my lawyering funk...may go solo soon too. Maybe I'll revive the blog then.
Great list, by the way. When I read the first four I thought, "is Shelley reading my mind?"
Posted by: Matt | December 25, 2007 at 19:09
I'm right there with you on #2. Nothing is worse than trying to draft a coherent reply to an incoherent brief. Particularly when the opposing attorney has invented totally new kinds of lies (as opposed to lies, statistics, etc.).
Glad you had a good Christmas!
Posted by: Mary Ann | December 28, 2007 at 08:58
I wish I could share my tricks dfor telling who's lying to me... it seems to be a knack i have. Actually, it keeps a lot of clients awayf from me! People who have something to hide seem to be afraid of me.
But i can share my favorite doctor joke.
This guy dies and goes to heaven, and St. Peter tells him what a great place it is, everyone is kind, friendly fair, nice, and great to hang out with. No more road rage, lousy tech support, bad attitudes, the whole bit. And it’s true—Heaven is just bliss.
Then one day while our happy friend is in the cafeteria line, this stranger in a white coat cuts in line, and the guy is incensed. He goes back to St. Peter and says “what gives with the dude in the white coat who cuts line?” St. Peter says… (wait for it…) "Oh—never mind him—that’s just God—sometimes he thinks he’s a doctor.” (ba dump.)
Here's to law is it ought to be.....
ECS
Posted by: E C Straus | December 30, 2007 at 14:47
You might enjoy this:
Doctors are whippersnappers in ironed white coats,
who spy up your rectum and look down your throats,
and press you and poke you with sterilized tools,
and stab at solutions that pacify fools.
I used to revere them and do what they said
'til I learned what they learned on was already dead.
Gilda Radner 1986
Posted by: Jim | January 04, 2008 at 12:09